1972 AMC Matador vs. 1999 Mercury Villager

To start off, 1999 Mercury Villager is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Villager (169 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Villager weights approximately 301 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Villager (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercury Villager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.

Compare all specifications: