1972 AMC Matador vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 770 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | AMC | Renault |
Model | Matador | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 50 L |