1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 195 kg more than 2000 Dodge Durango.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (469 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Durango. (454 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
Make | AMC | Dodge |
Model | Matador | Durango |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2950 mm |