1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka

To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 276 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.

Compare all specifications: