1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 432 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (468 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Matador | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 468 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 37 L |