1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 316 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 578 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (265 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | AMC | Jaguar |
| Model | Matador | XKA |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2590 mm |
