1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 660 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | AMC | Lada |
Model | Matador | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2500 mm |