1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 1028 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | AMC | Lotus |
| Model | Matador | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2420 mm |
