1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 174 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (468 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (353 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
Make | AMC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Matador | Profile |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2880 mm |