1972 AMC Matador vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
Make | AMC | Pininfarina |
Model | Matador | Metrocubo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 505 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 155 km/hour | 100 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |