1972 AMC Matador vs. 2002 Toyota F-1

To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (469 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota F-1. (430 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota F-1. 1972 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota F-1 has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota F-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: