1972 AMC Matador vs. 2003 Chrysler Airflite
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Airflite is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Airflite should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Airflite weights approximately 116 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler Airflite (341 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (265 Nm). This means 2003 Chrysler Airflite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2003 Chrysler Airflite | |
Make | AMC | Chrysler |
Model | Matador | Airflite |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 253 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 341 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 81 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 100 L |