1972 AMC Matador vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano (187 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano. (281 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2003 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | AMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Matador | Viano |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.2 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.3 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 75 L |