1972 AMC Matador vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (193 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 623 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Because 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Matador | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | AMC | Toyota |
| Model | Matador | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4982 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1567 kg | 944 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 87 L |
