1972 AMC Matador vs. 2003 Westfield ZEI

To start off, 2003 Westfield ZEI is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2003 Westfield ZEI. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield ZEI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 1064 kg more than 2003 Westfield ZEI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2003 Westfield ZEI has manual transmission. 2003 Westfield ZEI will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: