1972 AMC Matador vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 81 kg more than 2004 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (469 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2004 BMW M3 | |
Make | AMC | BMW |
Model | Matador | M3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 469 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 105.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.4 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 63 L |