1972 AMC Matador vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (332 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Matador | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | AMC | Ford |
| Model | Matador | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4982 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1567 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 132 L |
