1972 AMC Matador vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 5,897 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (220 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Matador | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | AMC | Ford |
| Model | Matador | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5897 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2490 mm |
