1972 AMC Matador vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 104 kg more than 2004 Nissan 350Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (373 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (332 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2004 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | AMC | Nissan |
Model | Matador | 350Z |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 287 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1567 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 76 L |