1972 AMC Matador vs. 2005 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Caprice (295 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (446 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (332 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2005 Holden Caprice | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | Matador | Caprice |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 446 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 155 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |