1972 AMC Matador vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 68 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | AMC | Mazda |
Model | Matador | B3000 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1552 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 74 L |