1972 AMC Matador vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 860 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (265 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | AMC | Nissan |
Model | Matador | Armada |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 106 L |