1972 AMC Matador vs. 2006 Audi S6
To start off, 2006 Audi S6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S6 (420 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Because 2006 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S6 (732 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (468 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2006 Audi S6 | |
Make | AMC | Audi |
Model | Matador | S6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 5204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 468 Nm | 732 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 12.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1870 mm |