1972 AMC Matador vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (255 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (469 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Matador | CTS |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 469 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 64 L |