1972 AMC Matador vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AMC | Ford |
Model | Matador | Ranger |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 59 L |