1972 AMC Matador vs. 2009 Bentley Continental GTC
To start off, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 5,996 cc, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC (552 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 442 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Bentley Continental GTC weights approximately 991 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC (650 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 385 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 AMC Matador. (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Bentley Continental GTC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 AMC Matador.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2009 Bentley Continental GTC | |
Make | AMC | Bentley |
Model | Matador | Continental GTC |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 5996 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 552 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 650 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 2475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 90 L |