1972 AMC Matador vs. 2009 Citroen C3
To start off, 2009 Citroen C3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (110 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 AMC Matador weights approximately 273 kg more than 2009 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2009 Citroen C3 | |
Make | AMC | Citroen |
Model | Matador | C3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1484 kg | 1211 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 45 L |