1972 AMC Matador vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (469 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 1972 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | Matador | Commodore |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6571 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |