1972 AMC Matador vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | Matador | Cruze |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2685 mm |