1972 AMC Matador vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (332 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 1972 AMC Matador has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 AMC Matador will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | AMC | Holden |
Model | Matador | UTE |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 332 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |