1972 AMC Matador vs. 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 AMC Matador (255 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pathfinder. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 AMC Matador should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pathfinder.
Because 2010 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 AMC Matador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 AMC Matador | 2010 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | AMC | Nissan |
| Model | Matador | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6571 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 187 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4884 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 80 L |
