1972 AMC Matador vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (110 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 AMC Matador (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 AMC Matador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | AMC | Dodge |
Model | Matador | Ram |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 98 L |