1972 AMC Matador vs. 2011 Volvo S80
To start off, 2011 Volvo S80 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 AMC Matador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 AMC Matador would be higher. At 4,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 AMC Matador is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo S80 (180 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1972 AMC Matador. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1972 AMC Matador. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S80 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1972 AMC Matador. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 AMC Matador is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 AMC Matador. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 AMC Matador | 2011 Volvo S80 | |
Make | AMC | Volvo |
Model | Matador | S80 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4982 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 180 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1567 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 67 L |