1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 1966 Austin A 40
To start off, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1966 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 1966 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 988 kg more than 1966 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 1966 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
| Model | AM Vantage | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 762 kg |
