1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 730 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | AM Vantage | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1020 kg |