1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (268 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac ATS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 220 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
Model | AM Vantage | ATS |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1530 kg |