1972 Audi Variant vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1972 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1972 Audi Variant.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Audi Variant. (113 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Audi Variant | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | Variant | Camaro |
Year Released | 1972 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1695 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |