1972 Audi Variant vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Audi Variant would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1972 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1972 Audi Variant.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Audi Variant. (113 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Audi Variant | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | Variant | Charger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1695 cc | 6063 cc |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 570 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3050 mm |
