1972 Audi Variant vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Audi Variant would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1972 Audi Variant. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1972 Audi Variant.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Audi Variant. (113 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Audi Variant | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | Variant | Calais |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1695 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
