1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1964 Holden EK
To start off, 1972 Austin 1800 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 1800 (86 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1964 Holden EK | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 1800 | EK |
Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 65 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |