1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1972 Austin 1800 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1972 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Austin | NSU |
Model | 1800 | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 37 L |