1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 1800 weights approximately 139 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1980 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Austin | Matra-Simca |
Model | 1800 | Murena |
Year Released | 1972 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 81.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1051 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2440 mm |