1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | 1800 | SS |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 68 L |