1972 Austin 1800 vs. 1997 Holden Nova
To start off, 1997 Holden Nova is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 1800 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1997 Holden Nova.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 1800 (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 1997 Holden Nova | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 1800 | Nova |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |