1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2002 Ford Puma

To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 1800 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Austin 1800 2002 Ford Puma
Make Austin Ford
Model 1800 Puma
Year Released 1972 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1797 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 86 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 140 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80.3 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 81.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 1035 kg
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 49 L 45 L