1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2002 Proton 400
To start off, 2002 Proton 400 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 1800 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2002 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Austin 1800 (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Austin 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 2002 Proton 400 | |
Make | Austin | Proton |
Model | 1800 | 400 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |