1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 280 kg more than 1972 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 1800 | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | 1800 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 101 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 72 L |
