1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (137 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 350 kg more than 1972 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 1800 | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | 1800 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 60 L |
