1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rodius (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 1027 kg more than 1972 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Austin 1800 | 2005 SsangYong Rodius | |
| Make | Austin | SsangYong |
| Model | 1800 | Rodius |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2217 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 80 L |
