1972 Austin 1800 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (139 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1972 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 1800 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Austin 1800 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | 3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |